[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Switching in the old encapsulation .. RE: Switching in new encapsulation.
- To: <ip-dvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
- Subject: Switching in the old encapsulation .. RE: Switching in new encapsulation.
- From: <harri.hakulinen@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:20:36 +0300
- Thread-index: AcHsNFZAHoMR6m//SXK1IcigCiGZfQAEW8EA
- Thread-topic: Switching in new encapsulation.
Moro,
Have you ever considered to use those "labels" or
"link addresses" with MPE ?
If they are implemented in TS adaptation field,
I think that you could use MPE as well. Thats why
I am little bit worrying that we are somewhat
mixmuxin things here.
PS. Our research people once made a feasibility
study about HW based MPE filtering on receiver.
As they are HW people, they of course made their
thing in a weird way (;) and I think that they
also accidentally proved that you can in fact do
(whatever layer) switching for TS that carries
MPE encapsulated frames based on any field
(in "TS packet level", without re-assembling and
that stuff, at least if you are not using
section packing).
In order to get some free time to do something
else than read these emails, I leave it to you
as a home execsise to find the solution. Just
forget everything that you have ever learned and
think like HW person ;)
//Harri
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Ghassane Aniba [mailto:Ghassane.Aniba@sophia.inria.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 11:22 AM
> To: ip-dvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
> Subject: Switching in new encapsulation.
>
>
> Hi,
> i've a question : the new encapsulation will give us possibility to
> switch mpeg packets in the layer 2 or not?
> Because i see that most of the proposed encapsulations don't do it,
> unless we make ressembling of mpeg packets.
>
> Ghassane.
>
> --
> Ghassane ANIBA
> INRIA (Projet PLANETE) | Email :
> ghassane.aniba@sophia.inria.fr
> 2004, Route des Lucioles BP 93 | Phone : +33 4 92 38 75 63
> 06902 Sophia Antipolis CEDEX France| Fax : +33 4 92 38 79 78
>