Please all respond: Call for the ipdvb WG to adopt: draft-fair-ipdvb-ar-04.txt

["Charalabos Skianis" <skianis@iit.demokritos.gr>]

Hi,

I vote for WG ID.

Harry

--On Montag, 25. April 2005 16:33 Uhr +0100 Gorry Fairhurst 
<gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> wrote:

| As WG chair, I request the ipdvb list to consider whether the WG is
| ready to support adoption of the following individual Internet Draft
| (ID) as a WG ID. By adopting an individual ID as a working group ID,
| this WG indicates that it intends to be develop this into an RFC,
| according to the WG charter.
|
| WG documents should no longer be regarded as the property of the
| individuals who originally authored them - the working group as a
| whole must decide how they are shaped, and to see the document to a
| successful conclusion. If adopted, the Internet Draft will be renamed
| to start with the filename draft-ietf-ipdvb..., and will be listed on
| the IETF web page for this WG.
|
|
| ---
|
|          Title           : Address Resolution for IP datagrams over
|                            MPEG-2 networks
|          Author(s)       : G. Fairhurst, et al.
|          Filename        : draft-fair-ipdvb-ar-04.txt
|          Pages           : 17
|          Date            : 2005-4-12
|
|     This document describes the process of binding/associating
IPv4/IPv6
|     addresses with MPEG-2 Transport Streams (TS). This procedure is
|     known as Address Resolution (AR), or Neighbour Discovery (ND).
Such
|     address resolution complements the higher layer resource discovery
|     tools that are used to advertise IP sessions. In MPEG-2 networks,
an
|     IP address must be associated with a Packet ID (PID) and a
specific
|     Transmission Multiplex The document reviews current methods. It
also
|     describes the interaction with well-known protocols for address
|     management including DHCP, ARP, and NDP, and provides guidance on
|     usage.
|
| A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
| http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fair-ipdvb-ar-04.txt
|
| ---
|
| You are encouraged to send email to this WG, to help make the decision
| for adoption.  Possible recommendations are:
|
|        1) Support for adoption as a working group draft under our
Charter
| -
|        i.e. Recommend this Internet Draft SHOULD be used as the basis
for
|        developing an RFC by the ipdvb WG.
|
|        2) Request for non-adoption
|        i.e. That there is (or could be) alternative approaches to
|        the problem, and that the current draft is not sufficiently
|        developed / or correctly designed ipdvb WG
|
|        3) Out of scope
|        i.e. you believe the document to be beyond the scope of the
|        approved ipdvb WG charter.
|
| Emails on this topic should be sent to the ipdvb mailing list before
| 6th May 2005.
|
| Note that an ID does not need to be complete to be adopted. It would
| also be most useful to collect as many comments/criticisms as possible
| from those reading this ID.  Looking through the archived mailing
| list, a first list of issues to be addressed is included at the end of
| this email.
|
| Please do help to identify any more known (or potential) issues that
| should be addressed/discussed.
|
| Best wishes,
|
| Gorry Fairhurst
| (ipdvb WG Chair)
|