[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MPE Question
- To: ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
- Subject: Re: MPE Question
- From: Siva Veerepalli <sivaveer@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=aytefoEnVA1itud2/uHo93pll4b9AoeY2HmuKfVdQljKEuNdBEMTCeQstWTTMLkOL4DVlw1tvXV3MhC2FLD7XQtvUDE4mBLnRLC+YgIz92UuUhqULsed6cMcZf5Im4UST9+fQ/falIan+d44q1TSEfL7+NM74tr2sWeNeXgvOQM= ;
- In-reply-to: 6667
- Reply-to: ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
- Sender: owner-ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
--- Bernhard Collini-Nocker <bnocker@cosy.sbg.ac.at>
wrote:
> Siva Veerepalli wrote:
> > A couple of questions about MPE-FEC framing.
> >
<snip>
> > 2. The MPE section has optional stuffing bytes at
> the
> > end of the section. Are these used? If yes, for
> what?
>
> Whenver an IP packets leaves "enough" space in the
> last TS packet
> another IP packet could be inserted. If not wanted
> or needed, stuffing
> takes care that the empty space is filled up with
> pattern 0xFF.
I was actually referring to the stuffing bytes in the
MPE section, not the TS packet. I understand the use
of stuffing bytes in TS packets, but am not clear why
stuffing bytes are used in MPE sections.
thanks,
Siva
>
> > thanks,
> > Siva
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com