[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Noticed some possible errors in the ULE draft, ANNEX A




Juan, thanks for the query it's easy to miss mistakes in the informative annexes, and we'd certainly like to get the text correct before this is published as a RFC.

Can someone please check this out (I can't at the momment)

Gorry


Juan Cantillo wrote:

Dear Gorry,
I am currently working on the "01 version" of our DVB-S2 draft and while re-reading the ULE-06 draft I came across what might be some typographic errors in ANNEX A: ********************* Page 38, example A2 "Usage of last byte in a TS packet":*************** The 4 shown SNDU sizes are 183, 182, 181 and 185 Bytes long, which would lead to "SNDU Length" fields of 0xB3, 0xB2, 0xB1and 0xB5, resp, since:
0xB3 = 183 - 4 (in decimal)
0xB2 = 182 - 4
0xB1 = 181 - 4
0xB5 = 185 - 4
(4 bytes are to be substracted to the length of the SNDU since the "SNDU Length" field DOES NOT count the 4-byte mandatory header of ULE) Instead, in the diagram we have 0x63, 0x62, 0x61and 0x65... it seems that the "B" was confused with "6" ?! ********************* Page 41, example A5 "three 44B PDUs":******************************** The three SNDUS are 52 bytes long, which would lead to "SNDU Length" of 48 bytes, coded in hexadecimal as 0x30 and NOT as 0x34. Please let me know whether those are typographic mistakes, or if it is me who is wrong... This last hypothesis is highly probable since "the errors" are similar, so I might be missing something! Looking forward to hearing from you soon, Juan =========================
Juan CANTILLO
SatComs PhD. Researcher
ENST/TeSA/ENSICA/ASP
+33 6 23 54 59 65
Toulouse, FR