[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: A proposal for a link timestamp option for ULE/GSE - Comments?
- To: <ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
- Subject: RE: A proposal for a link timestamp option for ULE/GSE - Comments?
- From: "Allison, Art" <AAllison@nab.org>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:08:01 -0500
- In-reply-to: <45E53F69.4050101@cosy.sbg.ac.at>
- Reply-to: ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
- Sender: owner-ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
- Thread-index: AcdbGfOet4SAdU9PTeSiCesWEExsYwEPpWSg
- Thread-topic: A proposal for a link timestamp option for ULE/GSE - Comments?
<I am not taking a position here in support of or in opposition to the invention of yet another link timestamp.>
I suggest no larger than 5ms tick, unless you do not care about lip-synch, that is, the RFC will state that this RFC is not intended to support delivery of synchronized audio-video streams of at least 'broadcast' quality.
See IS/191 at http://www.atsc.org/standards/is_findings.html for broadcast emissions. It recommends a limit of 15 ms for the minimum lead of audio with respect to video, so a 'tick' time that has resolution lower than the limit to be maintained seems problematical as an effective tool.
<I am not supporting or opposing the invention of yet another link timestamp.>
Art
_____________
Art Allison
Director, Advanced Engineering
Science & Technology
National Association of Broadcasters
1771 N Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: 202.429.5418
Fax: 202.777.4981
aallison@nab.org
The National Association of Broadcasters is a trade association that advocates on behalf of more than 8,300 free, local radio and television stations and also broadcast networks before Congress, the Federal Communications Commission and the Courts.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk [mailto:owner-ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Klaus Würflinger
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 3:38 AM
To: ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Subject: Re: A proposal for a link timestamp option for ULE/GSE - Comments?
Hi Johan,
PCR is defined in ISO/IEC 13818-1 to be 27MHz => 1/27MHz ~ 37ns.
PCR jitter limits are standardised in ETSI TR 101290.
ETSI standards are available for free download at www.etsi.org
Regards,
Klaus
johanfirdi wrote:
> Hi Georgios,
>
> how do u calculate PCR number come to37 nsec ?. and maximum allowed is
> 500 nsec.
> Do u have paper for this ?.
> Thanks
>
> Johan
>
> Georgios Gardikis wrote:
>> The granularity of the PCR goes down to 37 nsec and the maximum PCR
>> jitter allowed is 500 nsec.
>> The PCR field is 42 bits, and wraps around every 26 hours (it is an
>> incremental counter than a distance from midnight).
>> Maybe we could increase the resolution of the proposed timestamp to
>> be more accurate.
>>
>> George
>>
>> Dr. Georgios Gardikis
>> Associate Researcher
>> NCSR "Demokritos", Institute of Informatics and Telecommunications
>> Athens 153 10, Greece
>> Tel: +30 210 650 3108
>> Fax: +30 210 653 2175
>>
>>
>>
--
Klaus Würflinger
Multimedia Communications Group
Dept. of Computer Sciences
Paris Lodron University Salzburg
Jakob-Haringer-Str. 2
5020 Salzburg, Austria
T: (+43)662/8044-6332
F: (+43)662/8044-172
E: kwuerfl@cosy.sbg.ac.at