[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Adaptation field use in ULE / MPG2-TS specification
We used section packing for MPE since it would have not been fair... However
ULE had not limitations in the number of segments we could pack.
Marie-Jose
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Cipiere" <Patrick.Cipiere@udcast.com>
To: <ip-dvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: Adaptation field use in ULE / MPG2-TS specification
> Marie-Jose said
> ----------
> So I do believe we could use ULE in RCS. Actually in a recent study
> sponsored by ESA we showed that for traffic with a lot of ACK bursts
> (http: for example) ULE was very efficient because of it's packing
> capability.
> ----------
>
> Section packing is not specific to ULE.
> It is a feature shared by the mpeg2 layer: thanks to the PUSI bit,
> and the section layer: thanks to the embedded length included in the
> section header.
> It is up to the encapsulator do decide doing or not section packing.
> Section packing can be done with any kind of section, and works fine
> with MPE.
>
> Patrick.
> --
> UDcast: Full IP over Broadcast Media
>
> Phone: (+33) (0)4 93 00 16 99
> Mobile: (+33) (0)6 14 21 55 98
> Fax: (+33) (0)4 93 00 16 61 http://www.UDcast.com
>
>