[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Adaptation field use in ULE / MPG2-TS specification

To: ip-dvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Adaptation field use in ULE / MPG2-TS specification
From: Patrick Cipiere <Patrick.Cipiere@udcast.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 10:15:30 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: ip-dvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
In-reply-to: <> (mariejose.montpetit@verizon.net)
References: <> <>
Reply-to: ip-dvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Sender: owner-ip-dvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk

> Marie-Jose said
----------
We used section packing for MPE since it would have not been fair... However
ULE had not limitations in the number of segments we could pack.
----------

Could you explain the segment limitation in MPE?

Thanks,
Patrick.
-- 
UDcast: Full IP over Broadcast Media

Phone:  (+33) (0)4 93 00 16 99
Mobile: (+33) (0)6 14 21 55 98
Fax:    (+33) (0)4 93 00 16 61                 http://www.UDcast.com

References:
- Re: Adaptation field use in ULE / MPG2-TS specification
  - From: Patrick Cipiere <Patrick.Cipiere@udcast.com>
- Re: Adaptation field use in ULE / MPG2-TS specification
  - From: "Marie-Jose Montpetit" <mariejose.montpetit@verizon.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Adaptation field use in ULE / MPG2-TS specification
Next by Date: Re: Adaptation field use in ULE / MPG2-TS specification
Previous by thread: Re: Adaptation field use in ULE / MPG2-TS specification
Next by thread: Re: Adaptation field use in ULE / MPG2-TS specification
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread